Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andy Blank's avatar

Bottom line is, the more advanced society is, the more planning and advanced, long range thinking has to go into getting anything done.

What was the real difference between the Conquistadors and the Aztecs? It was the level of thinking and production that went into arming, equipment, and tactics. And even then, explorers with much more advanced technology (i.e. Magellan) could be slaughtered by primitives if they got overconfident and failed to use the advantages they had - and it's no coincidence Magellans' specific flaw was conversion to religious, mystical thinking.

In the same way, today drones, advanced aircraft, tracking technology, AI, could all be negated by failing to apply them. In a word, Afghanistan. Revolutions in technology only become revolutions in warfare if the Generals know how to apply them - and if Afghanistan is any indication, that is frightening.

Expand full comment
Contarini's avatar

Not sure how well the "generations of warfare" schema has held up.

It seems, as you note here, that all of these issues and methods have always existed, and that civil and military leaders must be willing and able to use all available means to secure their communities and defeat their enemies.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts