The Tactical Notebook

The Tactical Notebook

Share this post

The Tactical Notebook
The Tactical Notebook
Can We Revive Auftragstaktik? (IV)
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Can We Revive Auftragstaktik? (IV)

Franz Uhle-Wettler

May 16, 2025
∙ Paid
7

Share this post

The Tactical Notebook
The Tactical Notebook
Can We Revive Auftragstaktik? (IV)
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
Emil Hünten A Meeting with Prince Frederick Charles (detail)

This post forms part of a series. To read the first previous installments, please see

Can We Revive Auftragstaktik?

Can We Revive Auftragstaktik?

May 12
Read full story
Can We Revive Auftragstaktik? (II)

Can We Revive Auftragstaktik? (II)

May 14
Read full story
Can We Revive Auftragstaktik? (III)

Can We Revive Auftragstaktik? (III)

May 15
Read full story
Can We Revive Auftragstaktik? (IV)

Can We Revive Auftragstaktik? (IV)

May 16
Read full story

What is Auftragstaktik? And Can We Revive It?

Franz Uhle-Wettler

(Continued)

Intent

At first sight, it seems that battle procedures in the German array differed little from the procedures of other armies. A commander made sense of his situation, came up with a plan, and assigned missions to subordinate. On the basis of these missions, the latter repeated the process, conducting appreciations, making plans, and handing out tasks to leaders who reported directly to them.

In the course of doing this, each commander communicated the results he aimed to achieve and the context of his plan. In some cases, he used an explicit statement to share this intent. In others, he wove this vision into other parts of his order.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Tactical Notebook to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Bruce I. Gudmundsson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More