4 Comments

Yes, but.... Germany lost the War when it was defeated on the Marne. It should have said oops and done a deal. But it was too late to stop.

Expand full comment

I would reply, but, for fear of spoiling the plot, must stay my pen until after I have posted Parts 3 and 4. :o)

Expand full comment

Never mind parts 3 and 4, this is already a fascinating alternative history. A quick war on the eastern front; Russia defeated (again), humiliated (again), but not crippled as a state and its capital not starved for years (so forced into a more meaningful constitutional settlement but without Bolshevism or even abdication?); Germany triumphant but caught between even stronger German chauvinism and the massive Polish (and Jewish) populations it now has to govern; France screaming with rage at la perfide Albion for not backing them up, 'remember Fashoda' resurrected in a hundred African skirmishes (or perhaps a western front fought in Alsace-Lorraine and SW Germany?); the question of Home Rule for Ireland tearing Britain apart as the dominions look on in horror, without an external war to distract everyone; American isolationism prevailing (or not?) for another decade without German submarines to provoke her; the Austro-Hungarians still probably a basketcase but at peace when Karl succeeds, with time to pursue his dream of a multinational federation. And that's without getting into the Italians or Turks. You just wrinkled my brain.

Expand full comment

That's assuming that in this alternative history there still a Battle of the Marne to fight. If Germany decides to deploy East instead and have the rest of their forces sit along the Franco-German frontier rather than launch the modified Schlieffen Plan, should a Battle of the Marne occur, it'd be more likely to occur from a prolonged period of fighting due to French recalcitrance than it would be German aggression, as in our timeline

Expand full comment