Keep things the way they are and eliminate additional pictures if finding them takes too much time. Do not want a longer article if it means some part will be truncated that I cannot read.
I think that you are right about the additional pictures. (It seems that the limit imposed by Substack on the length of e-mails has more to do with the size of the file - which is greatly increased by pictures - than the number of words.
Keep up the great work Bruce, thank you educating me every day.
Thank you, Don! You never fail to motivate me.
Why not longer articles but with a 10-15 minute reading limit?
This is a good idea. (If I can't figure out how to get Substack to estimate reading time, I will make a back-of-the-envelope calculation of my own.)
Someone or someone thing is doing it already, your recent Clausewitz piece is listed as “3 min. read”.
I should point out that this timing information is on the Substack app not the email.
One of these days, I'll figure out this "app" thing that the kids keep talking about. :-)
Keep things the way they are and eliminate additional pictures if finding them takes too much time. Do not want a longer article if it means some part will be truncated that I cannot read.
I think that you are right about the additional pictures. (It seems that the limit imposed by Substack on the length of e-mails has more to do with the size of the file - which is greatly increased by pictures - than the number of words.